Whether long-time American legend Serena Williams, Japanese hotshot Naomi Osaka or Canadian sensation Bianca Andreesu captures the title at a tennis Grand Slam tournament these days, one thing’s for sure: The women’s players will get the same prize money as the men’s winner.
But that wasn’t always the case. The Open Era of tennis that we know today started in 1968, allowing professionals and amateurs to compete together for prize money. The gap between the two genders was blatant from the start, with the 1970 men’s winner Ilie Nastase earning $3,500 while Billie Jean King got $600.
King—who went on to win a total of 39 Grand Slam titles including 12 singles crowns—was not about to sit silent, taking home more than five times less than her male counterpart, so she raised the flag loudly, famously saying: “Everyone thinks women should be thrilled when we get crumbs, and I want women to have the cake, the icing, and the cherry on top too.”
King experienced gender discrepancies from the start
When King was 12, she played in a 1955 tournament at the Los Angeles Tennis Club and was ready to step into a group photo of junior players, until she was asked to step out of the frame. The reason: She was wearing shorts instead of the traditional tennis skirts the other girls were wearing. The early moment was eye-opening for the rising star, as she got her first taste of gender disparity in the sport she loved.
By the time she captured her first Wimbledon win in 1966 as an amateur, she also soared to the top of the rankings, becoming the No. 1 women’s player. Despite that status, she was still a Los Angeles State College student scraping by on $100 a week as a playground instructor.
Changes were afoot as the Open Era started, but even when King won her first Wimbledon, she got £750 (about $1,064) as opposed to the men’s winner Rod Laver, who scored £2,000 (about $2,840).
“I didn't have any idea we were going to get different prize money,” she said on American Masters. “I thought it was totally unfair.”